Commons:Undeletion requests

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from Commons:UNDEL)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcuts: COM:UNDEL • COM:UR • COM:UND • COM:DRV

On this page, users can ask for a deleted page or file (hereafter, "file") to be restored. Users can comment on requests by leaving remarks such as keep deleted or undelete along with their reasoning.

This page is not part of Wikipedia. This page is about the content of Wikimedia Commons, a repository of free media files used by Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. Wikimedia Commons does not host encyclopedia articles. To request undeletion of an article or other content which was deleted from the English Wikipedia edition, see the deletion review page on that project.

Finding out why a file was deleted

First, check the deletion log and find out why the file was deleted. Also use the What links here feature to see if there are any discussions linking to the deleted file. If you uploaded the file, see if there are any messages on your user talk page explaining the deletion. Secondly, please read the deletion policy, the project scope policy, and the licensing policy again to find out why the file might not be allowed on Commons.

If the reason given is not clear or you dispute it, you can contact the deleting administrator to ask them to explain or give them new evidence against the reason for deletion. You can also contact any other active administrator (perhaps one that speaks your native language)—most should be happy to help, and if a mistake had been made, rectify the situation.

Appealing a deletion

Deletions which are correct based on the current deletion, project scope and licensing policies will not be undone. Proposals to change the policies may be done on their talk pages.

If you believe the file in question was neither a copyright violation nor outside the current project scope:

  • You may want to discuss with the administrator who deleted the file. You can ask the administrator for a detailed explanation or show evidence to support undeletion.
  • If you do not wish to contact anyone directly, or if an individual administrator has declined undeletion, or if you want an opportunity for more people to participate in the discussion, you can request undeletion on this page.
  • If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers.
  • If some information is missing in the deleted image description, you may be asked some questions. It is generally expected that such questions are responded in the following 24 hours.

Temporary undeletion

Files may be temporarily undeleted either to assist an undeletion discussion of that file or to allow transfer to a project that permits fair use. Use the template {{Request temporary undeletion}} in the relevant undeletion request, and provide an explanation.

  1. if the temporary undeletion is to assist discussion, explain why it would be useful for the discussion to undelete the file temporarily, or
  2. if the temporary undeletion is to allow transfer to a fair use project, state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

To assist discussion

Files may be temporarily undeleted to assist discussion if it is difficult for users to decide on whether an undeletion request should be granted without having access to the file. Where a description of the file or quotation from the file description page is sufficient, an administrator may provide this instead of granting the temporary undeletion request. Requests may be rejected if it is felt that the usefulness to the discussion is outweighed by other factors (such as restoring, even temporarily, files where there are substantial concerns relating to Commons:Photographs of identifiable people). Files temporarily undeleted to assist discussion will be deleted again after thirty days, or when the undeletion request is closed (whichever is sooner).

To allow transfer of fair use content to another project

Unlike English Wikipedia and a few other Wikimedia projects, Commons does not accept non-free content with reference to fair use provisions. If a deleted file meets the fair use requirements of another Wikimedia project, users can request temporary undeletion in order to transfer the file there. These requests can usually be handled speedily (without discussion). Files temporarily undeleted for transfer purposes will be deleted again after two days. When requesting temporary undeletion, please state which project you intend to transfer the file to and link to the project's fair use statement.

Projects that accept fair use

Note: This list might be outdated. For a more complete list, see meta:Non-free content (this page was last updated: March 2014.) Note also: Multiple projects (such as the ml, sa, and si Wikipedias) are listed there as "yes" without policy links.

Adding a request

First, ensure that you have attempted to find out why the file was deleted. Next, please read these instructions for how to write the request before proceeding to add it:

  • Do not request undeletion of a file that has not been deleted.
  • Do not post e-mail or telephone numbers to yourself or others.
  • In the Subject: field, enter an appropriate subject. If you are requesting undeletion of a single file, a heading like [[:File:DeletedFile.jpg]] is advisable. (Remember the initial colon in the link.)
  • Identify the file(s) for which you are requesting undeletion and provide image links (see above). If you don't know the exact name, give as much information as you can. Requests that fail to provide information about what is to be undeleted may be archived without further notice.
  • State the reason(s) for the requested undeletion.
  • Sign your request using four tilde characters (~~~~). If you have an account at Commons, log in first. If you were the one to upload the file in question, this can help administrators to identify it.

Add the request to the bottom of the page. Click here to open the page where you should add your request. Alternatively, you can click the "edit" link next to the current date below. Watch your request's section for updates.

Archives

Closed undeletion debates are archived daily.

Current requests

Files from Museo Virtual "Alto Bierzo" uploaded by Galopax

License has changed per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Galopax&diff=next&oldid=629510730#File_copyright_status , User:Galopax/mv-ab, and https://mv-ab.geo-lab.info/wiki/informacion/licencia (the latter two in Spanish). Please ping me and Galopax.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:07, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pictogram voting info.svg Info It is unclear to me who should be attributed as the photographer and why the museum is authorised to grant a free license if the author is aunknown. Ankry (talk) 07:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @Galopax as uploader.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 22:54, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
About who should be attributed as the photographer and why the museum is authorized to grant a free license if the author is unknown, it must be taken into account that this's a series of photographs collected by a researcher and director of the Museum "Alto Bierzo", now retired, commissioned by the City Council of Bembibre, photographs, many of them, more than 70 years ago. And, most probably, all of them of unknown author, some of them because of their antiquity, the most modern ones as passport type photographs, and they could even be taken by photo booth type machines, none of them associated with an artistic image or author.
These photographs, which were once presented publicly, as noted in the introduction to this link (in Spanish), are in a space in the building of the City Council itself, as can be seen in this omnioramic image.
Why, how its authorship is attributed, what kind of license, authorization or similar supports this exhibition, this use, are questions that I think it's not appropriate to raise or question that institution, museum or city council.
Yes a management was made, in 2017-03-31, through email, in which it is made participant of the initiative Virtual Museum "Alto Bierzo" to responsible for the said Museum "Alto Bierzo" and, through it, to the Department of Culture of the City Council of Bembibre, a link that is maintained, as communication of 2022-01-26, in which the change of license from GNU to CC BY-SA is commented, a circumstance that, in turn, and for public knowledge, is reflected in the Wiki itself.
The first mail, from 2017, receives a response on 2017-05-11, in which it's stated: "With respect to the project Virtual Museum "Alto Bierzo", from the Department of Culture, Tourism and Festivals of the City Council of Bembibre, its authorization is given so that it can continue with the same", a project in Wiki mode, online, with link submitted and analyzed by these people, and containing specific information on license.
With this background, it has been considered validated the upload to Wikimedia Commons of photographs published in this virtual museum, in some way a reflection of a real one, even if equipped with many other photographs, most of them of own production, and other specific resources (Category:Museo Virtual "Alto Bierzo").
In any case, if there were any other question to raise, I would try to answer it. Best regards.--Galopax (talk) 10:10, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dit Clapper.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dit Clapper.jpg

This feels worth revisiting. If this was published in 1926, it would unquestionably be public domain in the US. Original DR suggested this was a Canadian photograph and this being pre-1946 would have definitely been PD in both Canada and the US. Abzeronow (talk) 16:36, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See the original image here. Our upload was actually just a crop. The caption mentions the "late 1920s" so I think pre-1927 is still too early to be PD in the US. On the other hand I can't see a copyright notice either. De728631 (talk) 10:16, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it's difficult to get a date on it but Getty is crediting Bruce Bennett who might have had it in his collection but definitely was not the photographer. The page does also say "Erstellt am: 1. Januar 1926" but looking at English wiki, 1927 seems a little more likely but of course 1928 and 1929 still also possible Abzeronow (talk) 01:04, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ammann Bros. newspaper article.jpg

It is not "nonsense" to include this deleted file...

File:Ammann_Bros._newspaper_article.jpg

...in the Wikipedia article...

List_of_lost_inventions#Questionable_examples

...or, at least include it in the category...

Category:Discovery_and_invention_controversies

...since the deleted file documents a lost invention of questionable character. The deleted file is a scanned newspaper article which uses an original photograph uploaded here...

File:Ammann_brothers%27_original_newpaper_photograph.jpg Vinyasi (talk) 08:00, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I also do not believe this invention is worthwhile including on en:List of lost inventions any more than the thousands of other free energy claims out there. The only mainstream press coverage was a single agency story that appeared in several newspapers (1, 2, 3). The only other mentions I see are, again pseudoscience sites peddling it as the lost secret to free energy. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:00, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I added a {{Factual accuracy}} to File:Ammann brothers' original newpaper photograph.jpg. Feel free to improve. Yann (talk) 21:17, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I get it. It's all or nothing. So, if there isn't any article on the topic of this photograph, then... 1. The deleted photograph doesn't deserve to be in Commons without the inclusion of a disclaimer tag (such as that added by Yann), nor... 2. Does the deleted photograph deserve to be included on the en:List of lost inventions, questionable or otherwise. In other words, newspaper clippings are not sufficient documentary evidence for an event (a public demonstration) for having taken place and there is no article on such events having taken place? Then what are newspaper clippings good for? Vinyasi (talk) 21:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We would indicate if a map had errors, or if an expert had indicated that an artwork was a fake. So yes, we will indicate if a file depicts the subject of a hoax.
Regarding use of the newspaper clipping on Wikipedia, please read en:WP:EXCEPTIONAL and en:WP:FRINGE: Any exceptional claim requires multiple high-quality sources. This article shows that these inventors claimed to have invented a car powered by free energy. It is a short agency article based on hearsay, from an era when such breathless reporting of claims was common in journalism. It is nowhere near the quality of source required to support the incredible claim of a completely new form of energy transmission. (If this invention was real and not a hoax, every scientific journal would have detailed coverage.) A single article also does not establish that the "invention" was notable. Dozens of people have claimed to invent cars powered by free energy; we do not need to include them on any list of inventions - even hoaxes - unless they received substantial press coverage.
Because the article is available on Newspapers.com (see my clipping link above), there is no need to host a copy on Commons even if it is used as a source. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:59, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Logos of LOT Polish Airlines

Copied from my talk page, for further opinions and comment. This relates to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kashmiri Ellywa (talk) 11:39, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you deleted File:LOT Polish Airlines.svg and File:LOT Polish Airlines Star Alliance.svg based on a mistaken comment of another editor. These are the official logotypes of an airline. I suggest reading COM:POLAND carefully:
"Except as specified otherwise below, copyright expires 70 years from the author's death, or from the last surviving co-author's death with works of joint authorship.[1996–2016 Art.36(1)] (...)
  • For work to which copyrights are entitled by law to a person other than the author, copyright lasts 70 years from the date of being made public (...)"
(underline mine)
The logos in question were copyrighted by LOT, the entity for which they had been created; not by the author. The copyright expired in 2021. The logos are free of copyright restrictions now.
This is a situation fundamentally different from a situation, for instance, where a painting has been reproduced in a publication under a licence but the work's author still retains full copyright.
I'd like to ask you to restore the logos. Thanks. — kashmīrī 00:46, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I think there's some confusion here. First, on Kashmiri's line of reasoning, the copyright would have expired on 1/1/2002 -- 70 years after the 1931 publication. I don't understand where the 2021 date came from. However, even 2002 is after the URAA date (1996), so they will be under copyright in the USA until 95 years from publication -- 1/1/2027. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:57, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I had 2001 in mind, finger slip - too much typing of "2021" recently.
You missed no. 1 in the main URAA test which applies here – there is no evidence that the logo was published within the United States during the 30 days following its publication in Poland. We need evidence to claim copyright under URAA (see notes there – uncertainty re. URAA alone can't be grounds for deletion). Whereas we know that LOT Polish Airlines did not fly to the US until 1938, eight years later. See https://www.polot.net/en/the_history_of_lot_polish_airlines_part_1_1929_1939.
Summing up - there are no grounds whatsoever to claim URAA, and the logo has been free of copyright since 2002. Just nobody bothered to check.
Notes — kashmīrī 17:43, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You have it backwards. In order for the URAA to apply it must not have been published within the USA within 30 days. see Commons:URAA-restored_copyrights#Preliminary_tests. Commons applies the URAA to all works unless they fail to meet the tests on the cited page. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:59, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The logo may be copyrighted by PLL LOT, but not by law but by contract with its author. the logo author is Tadeusz Lucjan Gronowski who died in 1990. This means that copyright to the logo expires in 2061. The logo might be copyrighted by PLL LOT by law only if Tadeusz Gronowski was a regular employee of PLL LOT and made the logo as his regular duty. This does not seem to be this case. Note also, that Polish copyright law does not recognize work for hire. So according to my knowledge the clause you mentioned applies only to works made by regular employees as part of their duty. Ankry (talk) 23:22, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 09:04, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Turkestan coa.gif

Please restore file File:Turkestan coa.gif, which is part of the free image of the COA of the Russian Empire File:Greater coat of arms of the Russian empire.png. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 11:55, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Not done: GIF duplicate of File:Coat of arms of Turkestan of the Russian Empire.svg. Not needed. --Yann (talk) 16:26, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jenny en Philips Christiaan Visser (1926).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jenny en Philips Christiaan Visser (1926).jpg

This seems to qualify for an anonymous work under Netherlands law, and this being a 1926 photograph might put it out of URAA now. Abzeronow (talk) 17:06, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Symbol support vote.svg Support The photo is {{PD-EU-anonymous}} and since it refers to the subjects returning from an expedition to central Asia, this appears to be a publicity photo. So we can assume that it was published in the same year making it {{PD-US-expired}} too. De728631 (talk) 16:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: as per De728631. --Yann (talk) 16:31, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

vice president bust

I did some digging and found 2 more busts the catalog has no entry in for either one and on the Senate's website it states what is carved into them and none of them have any reference to any copyright I have done this with every other bust over the past couple weeks and I'm sure these are the last ones except the nixon one which also doesn't have a copyright and the ones after 1989 which include Bush Agnew Quayle and Cheney and as for those I'm not sure because they come after 89 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Journey896 (talk • contribs) 01:19, 7 March 2022‎ (UTC)[reply]

Symbol support vote.svg Support Both busts are not registered in the Catalog of Copyright Entries. The Lyndon B. Johnson bust does have an inscription "Jimilu Mason / copywrite 1966" [1], but that is not a valid copyright notice under US law since it lacks the © symbol. So both files qualify for {{PD-US-no notice}}. While Kalervo Kallio who crafted the Barkley bust was a Finnish artist, the country of publication would obviously be the US. De728631 (talk) 16:24, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The © symbol is merely shorthand for the word "copyright" and either may be used. There is the question of whether the word "copywrite" is a problem, but my guess is that it is an effective notice. Carl, what do you think? .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the Lyndon B. Johnson bust. Under the guidelines of the Copyright Compendium, First Edition (which covered pre-1978 situations), it says, in section 4.2.2:
I. A misspelled or variant form of "Copyright" or "Copr." may be accepted if it is clear that copyright is meant. Examples of variants which may be accepted:
1. Copyrighted
2. Copywrite
3. Copywritten
4. Copyright Pending
5. Copyright Applied For
6. Copyright and Registered
7. Registered U.S. Copyright Office
8. Copy.
9. Copyr.
10. Cpr.
11. Corp. (if clearly not used to refer to a corporation.)
II. The equivalent of "Copyright" in a foreign language (e.g., the Spanish "derechos reservados") will not be accepted,
III. A variant of the symbol © will be acceptable only where it resembles the © closely enough to indicate clearly that the copyright symbol is meant. (The PDF has some examples of OK and not OK variants there. The @ symbol is not OK.)
So, based on that, the Lyndon B. Johnson bust above has a valid copyright notice. Being after 1964, that will expire in 2062. Registration was never required -- you had to register before you could renew, but you could even send the registration along with the renewal. It's the renewal for pre-1964 works which is required to find; the registrations can show when the copyright clock started but the lack of one doesn't necessarily mean anything, since using a notice was enough.
The Barkley bust, if it's this one, would appear to be from 1958 and does not have a copyright notice. If no registration, then it was not renewed, although it likely became PD as soon as it went on display where people could photograph it. So that one, Symbol support vote.svg Support. Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:26, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

User_talk:Herveroller

@Ankry as requested

Below is the link to where multiple 315e Regiment photos were deleted

File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 25.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 24.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 22.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 23.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 21.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 20.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 19.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 18.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 17.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 16.jpg


--Lyonsajh85 (talk) 16:58, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Herveroller

I am currently researching this regiment and therefore would be very valuable to see these photos. Therefore my question, can I have access for 24 hrs to review these photos? Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lyonsajh85 (talk • contribs) 12:58, 7 March 2022‎ (UTC)[reply]

  • Signing your posts is required on talk pages and Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
  • @Lyonsajh85: In order to process your request, you need to list the photos here. Ankry (talk) 22:42, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Lyonsajh85: They seem to come from this website. Daniel Durand (1888 – 1969) seems to have been the photographer. He was a serving soldier, when he took the photographs. --Broichmore (talk) 12:15, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That is my website :) within the large list above, I believe there are many photos that are not from Daniel Durand and ones that I have not seen before, will he help with research and potentially put names to faces Lyonsajh85 (talk) 13:55, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Can't be undeleted before 2040, unless a proof that Daniel Durand is not the author. --Yann (talk) 09:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

315e Regiment pictures (File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie User talk:Herveroller)

@Ankry as requested

Below are all the deleted photos, I would like to get access to view

File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 25.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 24.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 22.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 23.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 21.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 20.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 19.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 18.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 17.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 16.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 15.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 14.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 13.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 11.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 12.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 10.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 08.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 09.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 05.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 06.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 07.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 04.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 03.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 02.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 01.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 42.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 50.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 49.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 48.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 47.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 46.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 45.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 43.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 44.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 41.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 40.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 39.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 38.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 37.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 36.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 35.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 28.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 34.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 33.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 31.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 32.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 30.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 29.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 27.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 26.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 25.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 23.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 22.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 24.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 20.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 21.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 19.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 18.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 17.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 16.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 15.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 14.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 13.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 11.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 12.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 10.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 07.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 08.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 09.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 05.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 06.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 04.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 03.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 01.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 1914-1918 02.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-67.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-66.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-65.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-64.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-62.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-63.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-61.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-60.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-59.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-57.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-58.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-56.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-55.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-54.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-53.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-52.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-51.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-50.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-49.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-48.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-47.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-46.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-45.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-44.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-41.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-43.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-42.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-40.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-38.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-39.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-37.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-36.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-35.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-34.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-33.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-32.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-31.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-30.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-29.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-28.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-27.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-26.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-25.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-24.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-22.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-23.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-21.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-20.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-19.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14-18.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 50.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 49.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 46.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 48.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 47.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 45.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 43.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 44.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 42.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 40.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 41.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 39.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 36.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 38.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 37.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 33.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 35.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 23.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 32.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 31.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 29.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 28.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 27.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 26.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 25.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 24.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 30 (carte postale d'Epiez, route de Torgny).jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 34 (carte postale du château de Verpillières).jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 22.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 21.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 20.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 19.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 18.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 17.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 16.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 15.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 14.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 13.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 12.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 11.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 10.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 08.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 07.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 05.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 06.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 04.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 02.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 03.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 01.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 50.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 48.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 49.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 47.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 44.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 46.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 45.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 43.jpg File:315e Régiment d'Infanterie 09 (Ville sur Tourbe).jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 42.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 41.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 40.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 39.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 38.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 37.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 36.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 35.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 34.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 33.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 32.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 31.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 30.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 28.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 29.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 26.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 27.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 25.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 24.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 21.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 20.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 22.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 17.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 19.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 18.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 16.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 14.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 15.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 13.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 23 (Restant du moulin de Souain).jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 11.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 12.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 10.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 09.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 06.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 08.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 07.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 05.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 04.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 03.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 02.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 01.jpg File:Portrait Auguste Nayel.JPG

Sorry, but this is not a list we can work with. A list in MediaWiki code would look like this at least:
...
Also, these are 226 files that may all need to be checked one by one. De728631 (talk) 16:57, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Lyonsajh85: To make this workable, I suggest you split this request into batches of ten files which we can discuss step by step. So, to start with it, I'll put up the first 10 files for undeletion now:
De728631 (talk) 19:40, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @De728631
These are pictures from World War I with a wrong license (CC-BY-SA), no source, and wrong author (Herveroller). We need more information: where were they first published, etc. Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:43, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 09:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:My Little Pony fan art - Copy.jpg

I believe this file was deleted by mistake. It's an edited version of another file that was nominated for deletion here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Sexy_Rarity_on_seat.jpg The argument for deletion was that that one violated Commons:Fan art. The file I'm argued shouldn't have been deleted, ...Copy.jpg, was not actually nominated, and one of the 2 votes in favor for deleting Sexy_Rarity_on_seat.jpg supported the nomination precisely because this derivative file existed (and linked to it) - the supporter were definitely not suggesting the derivative file (...Copy.jpg) should also be deleted, which is what unfortunately happened. I made the edited copy (before the deletion request) precisely because I wasn't really sure whether or not the original might be considered to be in violation of the fan art policy. The edited version removed or changed all the unique characteristics of the original character (colors, mark on the hind leg) and was no longer identifiable as anything but a generic unicorn. (google: Rarity from My Little Pony and compare it with the deleted image) So I don't believe that the derivative could have been regarded as being in violation of the fan art policy, therefore, it should be reinstated. Thisisarealusername (talk) 01:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA candidate.svg Weak support I do not think it can still be considered a DW of the copyrighted character. Ankry (talk) 07:59, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Either this is My Little Pony and therefore probably in scope, but a copyvio, or it is not, in which case it is out of scope as personal art by a non-notable artist. In either case we shouldn't restore it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose agree with Jim: either COM:DW, missing essential info and permission, or personal artwork, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - This unambiguously a derivative work of the "Rarity" character. Originality in copyright means, in part, the expression owes its origin to the author, a prohibition of copying. For example, exactly three diamonds on the thigh, and with the same pattern therein. The number, shape, placement, pattern, and colouring are all directly and deliberately copied (derivative) expression. The same can be said about the entire figure--why one horn, not two or none, and in four segments? Why purple hair, grey body, and blue eye makeup? Not serendipity--the the creator copied the expression of the original instead of making their own independent/novel selections. Эlcobbola talk 17:24, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The picture definitely falls in scope - it's very useful for the "clop" article in English Wikipedia whether the pony in question is undeniably identifiable as a particular copyrighted character or not. Clop (and fan art in general) most definitely encompasses so-called "original characters" that are inspired by the MLP ponies, but aren't based on any particular one copyrighted character, and are drawn in all kinds of styles. So COM:WEBHOST does not apply, nor does COM:DW. As to elcobbola's comment, I wonder if you might have misunderstood which image it is I'm requesting non-deletion of, as your comment talks about details found in "Sexy_Rarity_on_seat.jpg" which were removed or changed in "My Little Pony fan art - Copy.jpg". It's the latter one I'm suggesting should be undeleted. Thisisarealusername (talk) 02:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe the confusion comes from how the picture will be used? Again, it's for use in the clop] article. If you give that article a read, I believe it should be obvious this picture is indeed in scope and extremely useful in this article. Any vote saying it's not is merely uninformed. Here is information on original characters from wiktionary also: [2], where it's been an entry since 2013 with 3 quotations from books on the topic. Thisisarealusername (talk) 02:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Belly-2473 1280.jpg

Hello this file is from pixabay. but i find it on other website. you can check link from pixabay in here; https://pixabay.com/photos/belly-body-clothes-diet-female-2473/

Was it uploaded to Pixabay before 2019? See {{Pixabay}}. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:18, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Symbol support vote.svg Support The original file was uploaded to Pixabay in 2010 [3], so the licence needs to be changed to {{Pixabay}}. De728631 (talk) 16:13, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: as per De728631. Please add categories. --Yann (talk) 16:46, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ntrain197

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ntrain197

I cannot see how these are sourced but the older photographs could be public domain, and the 1926 photograph might also be public domain now (if a team photograph might have been published in the 1927 yearbook and we might still need to wait a year on that). Abzeronow (talk) 17:27, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to Symbol support vote.svg Support this request. The photos are sourced to the Digital Collection of the University of Louisville. However, their server digital.library timed out when I tried to access the source websites, so I can't see any details yet. De728631 (talk) 16:08, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Eiffel Tower in pink, Paris - Oct 1, 2021.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ordinary light of the tower shouldn't bear any copyright. If it does, many images at Category: Eiffel Tower at night should also be deleted. A1Cafel (talk) 05:24, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While I could buy that the Tower in its default white lights probably isn't protected due to lack of creativity, anything more than that (which is definitely present here) would be creative. If we hold that the special lights are creative enough for copyright, which is being discussed at Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Eiffel Tower at night - anew, then certainly a number of images in the mentioned category should go. While I lean towards such images being copyrighted simply due to Precautionary Principle, the discussion at VP/C should conclude and be considered before anything is decided here. Huntster (t @ c) 05:54, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done: Not copyright in a pink light. --Yann (talk) 09:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

315e Regiment pictures (File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie User talk:Herveroller)

To make this workable as sugguested. Below are a batch of ten files which we can discuss step by step.

This photos are from this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Herveroller

So, to start with: File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 25.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 24.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 22.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 23.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 21.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 20.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 19.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 18.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 17.jpg File:315 ème Régiment d'Infanterie 1914- 1918 16.jpg

Same issue as above. No need to repeat the same answer. Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:21, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 09:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Antônio Rezk.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: It was probably marked incorrectly by the uploader, it should be marked with {{CC-BY-ALESP}}. ━ ALBERTOLEONCIO Who, me? 12:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Symbol support vote.svg Support per above. Ankry (talk) 15:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HOPPER AFFICHE GENERIQUE FR 120x160 HD.jpg

I hereby affirm that I represent nWave Pictures, the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the following media work:

I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Alexandre Milazzo Marketing and communication coordinator of nWave Pictures Amilazzo@nwave.com

@Biard Hippolyte: Please send the permission by email as instructed in COM:VRT. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:58, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

los libros descritos y puestos en mi biografía, corresponden a mi autoría


 Not done: No filename provided. Please log in, sign, and provide a filename. --Yann (talk) 16:54, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


File:Roksana Rahman Poly.jpg

Hi, The above image was deleted at DR under the rationale "unused personal image" - The image in question can also be found here,
IMHO there's some scope to this image - Indeed the person isn't notable however due to the way this image was taken, the lighting, and the hat she's wearing I believe there's some scope to this image as it's not your average joe selfie, So listing here to see what other editors/admins think, Being honest I'm 50/50 so listing here,
(Discussed this with the deleting admin (P199) who was happy for me to come here), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr page says it's "all rights reserved". Abzeronow (talk) 00:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MariaPetschnig.png

Please restore this file because we now have a VRT permission for the file from the photographer per Ticket:2022031410004601. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 22:15, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


✓ Done: @Ww2censor: . --Yann (talk) 08:55, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paramount1926.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ParamountLogoMaker

1926 would put it within being allowable on Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 23:32, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vladimir_Seixas.jpg

The image is released as Creative Commons attribution sharealike, so it can be used on Wikipedia Commons.

Link: https://www.flickr.com/photos/188710573@N06/51939545741/in/dateposted-public/ Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎Neepes (talk • contribs) 10:05, 15 March 2022 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]